Earlier this week, in Roman Catholic Archdiocese of New York v. Sebelius, U.S. District Judge Brian Cogan in the Eastern District of New York permanently enjoined the government from enforcing regulations mandating coverage for contraceptive and sterilization services by religious organization health plans.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act requires health insurance plans to provide preventative medical services. 
Continue Reading EDNY Judge Enjoins Enforcement of HHS Mandate

Over fifty cases across the country have challenged regulations promulgated under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“PPACA” or “Obamacare”) that require employer group health insurance plans to provide coverage for contraception, sterilization and related counseling (the “HHS Mandate”).  Suits have been filed by religiously-affiliated organizations as well as private business owners, asserting that the HHS Mandate will require
Continue Reading Are Suits Opposing Obamacare Mandates Ripe?

As Chris Kutner explained in his January 4, 2013 post, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (“PPACA” or “Obama Care”) requires, beginning in 2014, that employers with 50 or more full-time employees (“large employers”) offer “affordable” health insurance to their employees. Failure to do so will subject the employer to penalties. Recently published IRS proposed regulations

Continue Reading “Affordable” Health Coverage Under Obama Care

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (“PPACA” or “Obama Care”) requires, beginning in 2014, that employers with 50 or more full-time employees (“large employers”) offer “affordable” health insurance to its employees. Failure to do so will subject the employer to penalties.

Future blog postings will address the coverage requirements and penalties under PPACA, but to start, what

Continue Reading Obama Care Employer Mandates: Who Must Comply?

In this election season, both presidential candidates offer plans to deal with the rising cost of providing health care services, the President’s “Obamacare” by increasing the number of insured individuals through Health Insurance Exchanges, and reducing costs for a continuum of services through Accountable Care Organizations; and Governor Romney by a consumer-driven approach through Medicare vouchers, tax credits, and Health
Continue Reading Are Mandatory Price Controls the Answer to America’s Health Care Woes?

Now that the Affordable Care Act has been upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court, the requirement to control costs is critical.  One thing we can learn from the experience of near universal coverage in Massachusetts is that providing access to more citizens without containing costs is a recipe for disaster.  In 2006 Massachusetts achieved coverage for roughly 98% of its

Continue Reading Affordable Care Act: Bundling Payments to Control Costs

The United States Supreme Court has upheld the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act’s  individual mandate not because it is as an exercise of Congressional power under the Commerce Clause, but because the mandate is within Congress’s power to lay and collect taxes.

On Medicaid expansion, the Court ruled that the Act violates the Constitution by threatening states with
Continue Reading The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act’s Individual Mandate is Upheld as a Tax.

With a decision by the Supreme Court on the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act expected shortly, the New York Times has published a simple interactive tool examining the potential impact of the decision if the Court were to strike all, some, or none of the provisions of the law commonly knows as “Obamacare”.
Continue Reading Potential Impact of Supreme Court Decision on Health Reform Law